New Regulatory Decree and Trademark Office Resolution implementing amendments to Argentine Trademark Law
Jueves 30 de mayo de 2019
On June 3, 2019 the decree that regulates Argentine Trademark Law (Decree 242/2019) will enter into force. This directive regulates the amendments introduced by Law 27,444 entitled “Simplification and Debureaucratization for the Productive Development of the Nation”. Among the provisions of this Decree, the following deserve attention:
TRADEMARK COLOR AND FORMS – APPELLATIONS OF ORIGIN
• Even when the Trademark Law prohibits the registration of “the natural or intrinsic color of products or a single color applied to them” (1), the Decree provides for the possibility of obtaining registration in those cases in which the color to be registered has acquired supervening distinctive capacity (secondary meaning).
• Similarly, even if the Trademark Law prohibits the registration of “the shape of products” (2), the Decree clarifies that it is possible to obtain registration of the non necessary and non habitual shape of a product or a shape that has acquired supervening distinctive capacity (secondary meaning) as a result of its use.
• The Trademark Law provides that “national or foreign appellations of origin cannot be registered”. The Decree clarifies that said prohibition includes geographic indications expressly recognized by the Argentine Republic (3).
OFFICIAL ACTIONS – NEWS AND CHANGE OF TERMS
• The 10-year life of renewed trademarks shall be counted as from the renewal due date of the registration being renewed (and not as from the date on which the renewal application is accepted).
• The Trademark Office will be entitled to allow the partial registration of a trademark application, i.e. covering only some of the goods or services included in the application. The partial registration implies the refusal of the registration of the rest of the goods or services originally listed in the application.
• The period to answer objections raised by the Trademark Office due to formal defects is shortened to 10 working days. This term applies to those office actions related to objections on the correct classification of goods and services. (Previously, the period to answer this type of objections was of 30 working days.)
• The period to answer an office action issued by the Trademark Office on the basis of the substantive analysis of the application (such as lack of distinctive capacity or non registrability due to prior records) shall be of 30 calendar days. Only the following extensions of time will be available:
◦ 1° extension: 10 calendar days
◦ 2° extension: 5 calendar days
• If in addition to the objections raised by the Examiner, the application has received oppositions, the term to file a response shall be of 3 months. In this event, the Trademark Office shall not decide on the Examiner´s objection until the opposition has been resolved. Even in this case, it is highly advisable to file a response to the Examiner’s objection before the end of the term, as the Trademark Office shall not ask the applicant to answer the Examiner´s objection.
NULLITY ACTIONS – NEWS
• The Trademark Office shall resolve on nullity issues only when the registered trademark infringes the provisions of the Trademark Law (4). The courts will decide the nullity of registrations granted to anyone who “knew or should have known” that the registered trademark belonged to a third party (5). Similarly, the courts shall decide the nullity of those trademarks registered for their commercialization “by anyone whose habitual activity is the registration of trademarks for that purpose”(6).
• In those cases of trademark applications filed by anyone who “knew or should have known” that the registered trademark belonged to a third party or by anyone “who habitually registers marks for that purpose”, a third party could oppose said applications (or file the so-called “notice of alert” when the term for filing oppositions has expired) proving their nullity, in which case the Trademark Office might resolve the registration or refusal of the applications. This does not apply to registered trademarks with a registration resolution in force, in which case the nullity should be requested to the courts.
RENEWAL APPLICATIONS – GRACE PERIOD
• Renewal applications may be filed within 6 months, prior to or after, the renewal due date of the registration (previously, this term was of 60 working days prior to the renewal due date and no grace period was granted upon the expiration of such term).
CANCELLATION ACTIONS FOR NON-USE
• Non-use cancellation actions of any type, seeking either the partial or complete cancellation for lack of use of a trademark registration, should be filed with the Administrative authorities. The Trademark Office still has to establish the procedure for the resolution of these cases.
DECLARATION OF USE – BETWEEN 5TH & 6th YEAR OF REGISTRATION
• It is now required the filing of a use affidavit between the fifth and the sixth year as from the registration date. Said affidavit should inform about the use of the mark in our country until the date the declaration is filed. It will be required for all registrations granted as of January 12, 2013. Renewal applications shall not be accepted if the 5th-year declaration of use is missing. The Trademark Office may demand the filing of the affidavit of use, and in lack of response, declare the lapsing of the renewal application.
• It will be possible to file the affidavit of use later on. Yet, as of January 12, 2020, the Trademark Office will require the payment of additional official fees for each year in breach of the obligation to file the affidavit of use.
If the mark to be renewed has not been used in Argentina until the period going from the 5th to the 6th year (for example, if the mark started being used on the 8th year after registration), at the time of filing the renewal application it will be possible to file an affidavit declaring use in Argentina and pay the official fees corresponding to both the mid-term use declaration and the renewal application, which requires the filing of a use declaration as well, with any surcharge the Trademark Office might establish.
• Considering the new requirement for the filing of a mid-term use declaration, two basic scenarios may occur:
a) The mark has been used in Argentina.
• In this case, the 5th-year use declaration should be filed and the official fees must be paid.
This declaration constitutes a presumption of use of the registered trademark. Therefore, even when said declaration has been filed, any interested third party can challenge the declaration and eventually file a non use cancellation action (i.e. the presumption that the mark has been used may be reversed):
If possible, it would be convenient that the use declaration be completed including any evidence of use that can be digitally submitted or scanned and is available at the time of its filing. The more complete the use declaration is, the greater the presumption of use shall be, and consequently, the greater the chances of discouraging potential non-use cancellation actions.
b) The mark has not been used in Argentina.
In this case, the registration shall be subject to a potential partial or total non-use cancellation action either ex officio by the Trademark Office or at the request of a third party.
To proceed with the renewal of a trademark registration, the Trademark Office shall accept a mid-term declaration of “non use”, i.e. it will be possible to declare that the registered mark was not used within the first five years, provided it has been used afterwards to comply with the renewal requirement.
(1) Trademark Law, SECTION 2: The following shall not be considered trademarks and shall not be registrable: (d) the intrinsic or natural color of products or a single color applied to them.
(2) Trademark Law, SECTION 2: The following shall not be considered trademarks and shall not be registrable: (c) the shape given to products.
(3) Trademark Law, SECTION 3: The following cannot be registered: (c) national or foreign appellations of origin.
(4) Trademark Law, SECTION 24. — The following trademark registrations are null: (a) those registered in breach of the provisions of this law.
(5) Trademark Law, SECTION 24. — The following trademark registrations are null: (b) those registered by anyone who, at the time of applying for their registration, knew or should have known that they belonged to a third party.
(6) Trademark Law, SECTION 24. — The following trademark registrations are null: (c) Those registered for their commercialization by anyone whose habitual activity is the registration of trademarks for that purpose.
For any enquires do not hesitate to contact us: email@example.com
BERTON MORENO + OJAM
This publication is not intended to provide legal or any other particular advice.